AN EASY METHOD FOR PASSING AN INTESTINAL INTUBATION TUBE UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCEGELFAND DW.1978; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 129; NO 2; PP. 532; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

THE JAPANESE-STYLE DOUBLE-CONTRAST EXAMINATION OF THE STOMACH.GELFAND DW.1976; GASTROINTESTIN. RADIOL.; GERM.; DA. 1976; VOL. 1; NO 1; PP. 7-17; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

ANATOMY OF THE LIVERGELFAND DW.1980; RADIOL. CLIN. NORTH AM.; ISSN 0033-8389; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 18; NO 2; PP. 187-194; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

HIGH DENSITY, LOW VISCOSITY BARIUM FOR FINE MUCOSAL DETAIL ON DOUBLE-CONTRAST UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL EXAMINATIONS.GELFAND DW.1978; AMER. J. ROENTEGENOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 130; NO 5; PP. 831-833; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

COLORECTAL TUMORS: PATHOLOGY AND DETECTIONOTT DJ; GELFAND DW.1978; AMER. J. ROENTGENOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 131; NO 4; PP. 691-695; BIBL. 70 REF.Article

DECLINING VOLUME OF GASTROINTESTINAL FLUOROSCOPIES: A SURVEY OF 18 HOSPITALSGELFAND DW; OTT DJ.1982; GASTROINTEST. RADIOL.; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 7; NO 3; PP. 227-230; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

COMPLICATIONS OF GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGIC PROCEDURES. II: COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO BILIARY TRACT STUDIESOTT DJ; GELFAND DW.1981; GASTROINTEST. RADIOL.; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 47-56; BIBL. 94 REF.Article

COMPLICATIONS OF GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGIC PROCEDURES. III: COMPLICATIONS OF DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHYHUNT TH; GELFAND DW.1981; GASTROINTEST. RADIOL.; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 57-67; BIBL. 87 REF.Article

LARGE-CALE TIME-SHARING X-RAY GENERATORSGELFAND DW; HOW JR.1979; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 130; NO 2; PP. 535-536; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

CAUSES OF ERROR IN GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY. II: BARIUM ENEMA EXAMINATIONOTT DJ; GELFAND DW; RAMQUIST NA et al.1980; GASTROINTESTIN. RADIOL.; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 99-105; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

PNEUMOPERITONEUM OCCURRING DURING DOUBLE-CONTRAST ENEMAGELFAND DW; OTT DJ; RAMQUIST NA et al.1979; GASTROINTESTIN. RADIOL.; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 307-308; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

EFFICACY OF RADIOLOGY OF THE ESOPHAGUS FOR EVALUATION OF DYSPHAGIAOTT DJ; WU WC; GELFAND DW et al.1981; GASTROINTEST. RADIOL.; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 109-110; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

GASTRIC PERFORATION FROM HEPATIC ARTERY INFUSION CHEMOTHERAPYCHOPLIN RH; GELFAND DW; HUNT TH et al.1983; GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1983; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 133-134; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

SENSITIVITY OF SINGLE-CONTRAST RADIOLOGY IN ESOPHAGEAL DISEASE: A STUDY OF 240 PATIENTS WITH ENDOSCOPICALLY VERIFIED ABNORMALITYOTT DJ; GELFAND DW; WU WC et al.1983; GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1983; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 105-110; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

CAUSES OF ERROR IN GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY. I: UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL EXAMINATIONGELFAND DW; OTT DJ; TRITICO R et al.1980; GASTROINTESTIN. RADIOL.; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 91-97; BIBL. 33 REF.Article

THERMAL INJURY OF THE COLON DUE TO COLOSTOMY IRRIGATIONJACKSON FR; OTT DJ; GELFAND DW et al.1981; GASTROINTEST. RADIOL.; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 231-233; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

THE EXTENT OF SUCCESSFULL COLONOSCOPY: ITS IMPLICATION FOR THE RADIOLOGISTGELFAND DW; WU WC; OTT DJ et al.1979; GASTROINTESTIN. RADIOL.; DEU; DA. 1979; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 75-78; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

EXTENT OF COLONIC VISUALIZATION WITH THE FIBEROPTIC SIGMOIDOSCOPEOTT DJ; WU WC; GELFAND DW et al.1982; J. CLIN. GASTROENTEROL.; ISSN 0192-0790; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 4; NO 4; PP. 337-341; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS REVISITED: PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF RADIOLOGIC ACCURACYOTT DJ; WU WC; GELFAND DW et al.1981; GASTROINTEST. RADIOL.; ISSN 0364-2356; DEU; DA. 1981; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 1-7; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS: RADIOGRAPHIC AND ENDOSCOPIC CORRELATIONOTT DJ; GELFAND DW; WU WC et al.1979; RADIOLOGY; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 130; NO 3; PP. 583-588; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

RADIOLOGIC DETECTION AND SPECTRUM OF APPEARANCES OF PEPTIC ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURESOTT DJ; GELFAND DW; LANE TG et al.1982; J. CLIN. GASTROENTEROL.; ISSN 0192-0790; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 4; NO 1; PP. 11-15; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

SENSITIVITY OF SINGLE-VS. DOUBLE-CONTRAST RADIOLOGY IN EROSIVE GASTRITISOTT DJ; GELFAND DW; WU WC et al.1982; AM. J. ROENTGENOL.; ISSN 0092-5381; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 138; NO 2; PP. 263-266; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

SENSITIVITY OF DOUBLE-CONSTRAST BARIUM ENEMA: EMPHASIS ON POLYP DETECTIONOTT DJ; GELFAND DW; WU WC et al.1980; AM. J. ROENTGENOL.; ISSN 0092-5381; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 135; NO 2; PP. 327-330; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

THE SENSITIVITY OF RADIOGRAPHY OF THE POSTOPERATIVE STOMACHOTT DJ; MUNITZ HA; GELFAND DW et al.1982; RADIOLOGY; ISSN 0033-8419; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 144; NO 4; PP. 741-743; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

CURRENT STATUS OF RADIOLOGY IN EVALUATING FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASEOTT DJ; DODDS WJ; WU WC et al.1982; J. CLIN. GASTROENTEROL.; ISSN 0192-0790; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 4; NO 4; PP. 365-375; BIBL. 118 REF.Article